RefVid

AI product video statistics: what people actually make - RefVid

Turn your own photos into videos in minutes · Your first video is free, no watermark

  • Free first video
  • No watermark
  • Commercial use
  • Product 360 video of AERO 1, a grey and orange running shoe
  • Example video of the Wallet Open and Close template
  • Floating Product video of AERO 1, a grey and orange running shoe
  • Bullet Time video of LUMEN, a serum bottle with a dropper
  • Water Splash video of LUMEN, a serum bottle with a dropper
  • Unboxing video of LUMEN, a serum bottle with a dropper
  • UGC Ad video of Mia and LUMEN
  • Flat Lay video of EMBER, a black bag of coffee

First video free, no card

Statistics as of November 6, 2026, refreshed on the 1st of each month. 55% of the videos people made on RefVid have a product as the subject, the average clip is 5.4 sec long, and 64% start from a ready-made template.

These numbers come from the 391 videos that 344 people outside our team finished on RefVid between October 27, 2026 and November 6, 2026, counted anonymously and rounded. Below them are public market and viewing numbers, each with a link to its source.

Video of AERO 1, a grey and orange running shoe
The most-used template in this data, the 360° product turntable (28% of all videos): made with RefVid on Kling 3.0 Omni from 3 reference photos of the AERO 1 shoe, 5 seconds, 720p.

Key statistics from RefVid

  • Between October 27, 2026 and November 6, 2026, 391 videos were finished by 344 people outside our team. 85% of them were made on free signup credits, so these numbers describe first videos more than seasoned workflows. 86% of started generations finished; the credits of the rest went back to the account automatically.
  • Products lead: 55% of videos show a product, 27% a person or character, and 18% were made from a prompt alone, with no subject photos.
StatisticValue
Videos finished by people outside our team391
People who finished at least one video344
Started generations that finished86%
Videos made on free signup credits85%
Videos with a product as the subject55%
Videos started from a template64%
Videos made from a product template41% of all videos, 64% of template videos
Most-used template: 360° product turntable28% of all videos
Median time from Generate to a finished clip2 min
Source: RefVid's own database, read-only aggregate counts, October 27 – November 6, 2026 (snapshot November 6, 2026, 13:44 UTC). Our own team and test accounts are left out. No emails, prompts or videos were read; percentages are rounded to whole numbers.

How long and in what format: AI video statistics by clip

  • The average clip is 5.4 sec and the median is 5 sec: 79% of all videos are exactly 5 seconds long. Only 8% run 10 seconds or more, which matches how product clips are used, as a short loop on a product page or the first seconds of an ad.
  • Vertical 9:16 makes up 42% of videos, landscape 16:9 31% and square 27%. Most clips are silent 720p, the setting the free credits pay for.
SettingShare of videos
Exactly 5 seconds79%
3–4 seconds11%
6–9 seconds2%
10 seconds or longer8%
Vertical 9:1642%
Landscape 16:931%
Square 1:127%
With sound17%
1080p (the rest 720p)3%
Two or three shots in one clip4%
Source: RefVid database, 391 finished videos, October 27 – November 6, 2026. Shares are rounded, so a group may not add up to exactly 100%.

Which AI video models people choose, and how often each one succeeds

  • 9 models made videos in this period, and Kling 3.0 Omni made 66% of them. That is mostly because the free signup credits run on Kling 3.0 Omni at 720p without sound; paid clips start on Kling 4, which costs more per second and adds sound.
  • Success rate is the share of generations that ended in a finished clip instead of an error; the credits of a failed one go back to the account. Median wait is the time from pressing Generate to the finished clip. Both are shown only for a model with at least 20 finished or failed generations in the period, so no rate rests on a handful of tries.
ModelShare of videosGenerations (sample)Success rateMedian wait
Kling 3.0 Omni66%31083%2.1 min
PixVerse C120%8099%1.4 min
Kling 45%18Under 20 triesUnder 20 tries
Vidu Q44%2171%4.2 min
Wan 3.03%13Under 20 triesUnder 20 tries
Vidu Q22%9Under 20 triesUnder 20 tries
Gemini Omni Flash<1%1Under 20 triesUnder 20 tries
Happy Horse 1.1<1%1Under 20 triesUnder 20 tries
MiniMax H3<1%1Under 20 triesUnder 20 tries
Seedance 2.50%3Under 20 triesUnder 20 tries
Source: RefVid database, 457 finished or failed generations and 391 finished videos, October 27 – November 6, 2026, counted by the model that made each one. Median wait is over finished videos.

Free vs paid generations: what people make and how it turns out

  • 15% of finished videos were made by accounts that had bought credits or a plan; the rest ran on the free signup credits. The free credits pay for one silent 720p clip on Kling 3.0 Omni, so free videos cluster there, while paid ones can use any model, length, sound and resolution.
  • Each column counts its own generations, so the shares compare like with like: the sample row says how many generations stand behind each column.
MeasureFree signup creditsPaid credits
Generations finished or failed (sample)38869
Finished videos33160
Success rate85%87%
Median clip length5 sec8 sec
Videos with sound14%35%
Videos in 1080p2%12%
Videos made on Kling 3.0 Omni68%55%
Median wait, Generate to finished clip2 min3 min
Source: RefVid database, October 27 – November 6, 2026. Free = made by an account still on its free signup credits; paid = made by an account that had bought credits or a plan. Shares are of each column's finished videos.

How many people come back to make another video

  • Of the 344 people who finished a video, 1% made videos on two or more different days, which is how we count a returning user. 8% made two or more videos in all, and each person finished 1.1 videos on average.
  • Most people in this period made their first and only free clip, so this is the number to watch from one monthly snapshot to the next.
StatisticValue
People who finished at least one video (sample)344
Returning: finished videos on 2 or more different days1%
Finished 2 or more videos8%
Finished 5 or more videos1%
Finished videos per person, average1.1
Source: RefVid database, October 27 – November 6, 2026, counted per account with our own accounts left out. Days are calendar days in UTC.

AI video generator statistics: the market

  • Two market research firms put the AI video generator market at roughly 700 to 800 million US dollars in 2025, growing about 19–20% a year to more than 3 billion dollars by the early 2030s. Marketing is the largest use for these tools in both reports.
  • These are estimates from paid reports, quoted from the publishers' own summary pages; the two firms define the market slightly differently, so their numbers do not match exactly.
StatisticValueSource
AI video generator market size, 2025USD 716.8 millionFortune Business Insights
Forecast, 2026 → 2034USD 847 million → USD 3,350 million (18.8% a year)Fortune Business Insights
Marketing and advertising share of the market, 202633.88%, the largest applicationFortune Business Insights
Text-to-video share of the market, 202646.25%Fortune Business Insights
AI video generator market size, 2025USD 788.5 millionGrand View Research
Forecast, 2033USD 3,441.6 million (20.3% a year from 2026)Grand View Research
Checked November 4, 2026 on each publisher's market summary page, linked below.

Short video and viewers: public numbers

  • Short wins attention. In Vidyard's analysis of more than 940,000 business videos made in 2024, 65% of viewers watched videos under one minute to the end, against 20% for videos over 20 minutes. In Sprout Social's 2026 Content Strategy Report, 52% of social users said short-form video under 60 seconds is what they interact with most on Instagram, and 48% on Facebook.
  • That lines up with what RefVid users choose on their own: 79% of videos are 5 seconds long, and 42% are vertical.
StatisticValueSource
Viewers who watch a business video under 1 minute to the end (2024 data)65%Vidyard
Viewers who watch a business video over 20 minutes to the end (2024 data)20%Vidyard
Business videos created on Vidyard in 2024943,305Vidyard
Social users most likely to interact with short-form video on Instagram (2026)52%Sprout Social
Social users most likely to interact with short-form video on Facebook (2026)48%Sprout Social
Checked November 4, 2026. Vidyard: 2025 Video in Business Benchmark Report (January 1 – December 15, 2024 data from its customers). Sprout Social: 2026 Content Strategy Report, as quoted on its video statistics page.

How we compiled this data, and before you cite it

  • RefVid numbers: one read-only query on November 6, 2026 counted finished and failed generations by model, length, format, template, subject type and account tier, and for each account how many videos it finished on how many days. Accounts of our own team and test accounts were left out, and nothing that could identify a person was read or kept: no emails, IP addresses, prompts or videos. The period is short, October 27, 2026 to November 6, 2026, and most people were on their free first clip, so treat the shares as an early snapshot, not a trend.
  • We take a new snapshot on the 1st of each month. The date line at the top of the page is the date of the snapshot, and every earlier snapshot stays in the history table at the end of the page.
  • Public numbers: quoted from each publisher's own page on November 4, 2026, with the date range they state. We left out widely repeated figures whose original source we could not open and check.

How to cite these statistics

  • RefVid, “AI product video statistics”, snapshot of November 6, 2026, https://refvid.com/ai-product-video-statistics. You are welcome to quote any number on this page: please link to the page and give the snapshot date, since the numbers change every month.
  • Quoting a model's finished share or wait? Link straight to its table, https://refvid.com/ai-product-video-statistics#models. The same per-model figures are also a CSV file, one row per model from the snapshot of November 6, 2026: clips started, finished and failed, the finished share, the median wait in seconds and today's price per second and per clip. Reuse it freely with a link to this page.

Snapshot history

  • Every snapshot of this page, newest first. Earlier rows are never edited, so a number quoted from an older snapshot can still be checked here.
SnapshotPeriodVideos finishedPeopleStarted generations that finishedProduct as the subjectAverage clip lengthMade on free credits
November 6, 2026October 27 – November 6, 202639134486%55%5.4 sec85%
November 5, 2026October 27 – November 5, 202633629084%55%5.6 sec83%
November 4, 2026October 27 – November 4, 202620717383%59%5.9 sec75%
Source: RefVid database, one read-only snapshot per row, our own accounts left out. The first snapshot, November 4, 2026, was taken before the per-model, free vs paid and returning-user tables were added.

Start from a template

Each one opens the studio with the shots, shape and length already set. Add your own product and generate.

More product videos

Product videos →

Frequently asked questions

What do AI product video statistics show in 2026?

In RefVid's data from October 27, 2026 to November 6, 2026, 55% of finished videos had a product as the subject, the average clip was 5.4 sec, 79% were exactly 5 seconds, and 64% started from a template, most often the 360° product turntable. Market research puts the AI video generator market at about 0.7–0.8 billion US dollars in 2025, with marketing as its largest use.

How long should an AI product video be?

Most people choose 5 seconds: that was 79% of the videos finished on RefVid in this period, and the average was 5.4 sec. Vidyard's 2024 data shows why short works: 65% of viewers watch videos under one minute to the end.

How often does AI video generation fail?

On RefVid, 86% of 457 finished or failed generations between October 27, 2026 and November 6, 2026 ended in a finished clip, and the median wait from Generate to the clip was 2 min. The model table on this page gives the rate and wait for each model with at least 20 generations; the credits of a failed generation go back to the account.

Which AI video statistics here come from RefVid itself?

Every table except the two on the market and on viewers: videos, people, success rate, product share, templates, length, format, sound, resolution, shots, models, free vs paid and returning users. They are anonymous aggregate counts from RefVid's database, rounded, with our own team's accounts left out. The market and viewing numbers come from Fortune Business Insights, Grand View Research, Vidyard and Sprout Social, linked on the page.

How much does an AI product video cost on RefVid?

Your first clip is free with the signup credits. After that a single clip starts at $2.99, one-time credit packs start at $9.90 and monthly plans at $10; credits never expire. A 5-second clip on the cheaper model uses fewer credits than the same clip on Kling 4.

How often is this page updated?

On the 1st of each month. We take a new snapshot of RefVid's numbers, re-check every public source, set the date line to the snapshot date and add the snapshot to the history table at the end of the page. Earlier snapshots are never edited, so an older citation can still be checked.

By All guides